“Harry Potter”: It All Ends Today

Harry Potter 7It’s been 14 years since J.K. Rowling released the first book about the boy wizard who lived, and just under 10 years since the first movie hit the theaters. With the release today of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, it all ends.

ABC News stated in an April 4 article that the seven books have sold nearly 450 million copies worldwide. This makes it the most popular book series ever, about 100 million more than the second-place “Goosebumps” series. And it’s a number that is sure to increase when the books are released as e-books in October.

BoxOfficeMojo.com says the seven films have grossed nearly $6.4 billion worldwide. This makes it the highest grossing franchise ever, beating out the 22 “James Bond” films ($4.9 billion) and the six “Star Wars” movies ($4.6 billion). That number should cross the $7 billion mark before the latest movie leaves the theaters.

So whether you liked the books and/or the movies, there is one thing you simply cannot argue with: “Harry Potter” is a phenomenon.

Many of the people who have followed Harry’s adventures were just kids when the first book came out in June of 1997. They have read every book and seen every movie. And as the stories come to an end with today’s release of the eighth and final movie, those kids are now in their mid- to late-twenties. At least half of their lives have been spent following Harry as he grew up from a 11-year-old boy to a 17-year-old young man.

I was late to the “Harry Potter” party. I have never read the books, and haven’t decided if I ever will. The first movie I saw was Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, though I have watched every movie in the theater since and own all but Part 1 of “Deathly Hallows” on DVD.

But once I started watching the movies, I was fascinated. And that fascination has grown for one simple reason: Not only did we get to see Harry and his friends grow up on screen, but we also saw the actors grow up as well.

With the exception of the characters of Albus Dumbledore, who had to be recast in the third movie after Richard Harris passed away, and young Voldemort, who had to be recast in the sixth movie since Christian Coulson was too old to play that young of a character again, all of the major characters, as well as the major supporting characters, still have the same actors portraying them. From Harry, Ron, and Hermione, to Seamus and Neville, to all the Weasleys, to all the Hogwarts professors, all of the actors who originated the roles are still in them.

That is one amazing feat. And a feat that makes watching all the movies through again much more enjoyable. I remember all the talk and rumors after “Goblet of Fire” about recasting Harry, Ron, and Hermione. We can only wonder if the franchise would have continued to be as hot as it’s been had those recast rumors come true.

It will probably be at least Tuesday before I go see the last movie. Unlike former Idol Radio Show Regular, Charlie Spillers, who flew from his home in California to his mom’s house in Florida this week simply so he could see the final movie three hours sooner. Now THAT is dedication.

So how dedicated of a “Harry Potter” fan are you? Have you read all the books? Seen all the movies? What do you think about the franchise? Leave your thoughts in the comments section below.

FacebookEmailBookmark/FavoritesDiggLinkedInStumbleUponShare
Thanks for rating this! Now tell the world how you feel via Twitter.
How does this post make you feel?
  • Excited
  • Fascinated
  • Amused
  • Bored
  • Sad
  • Angry


comments

3 comments

  1. ABB says:

    You simply must read the books, Alan. There is so much in them that couldn’t be put in the movie simply for the sake of time. If you enjoyed the movies at all, then you’ll love the books. My daughter is away at camp right now, and I promised that I’d wait for her to go see the movie. I prefer waiting until the 2nd week anyway and then going to a matinee showing. Less of the obnoxious people who can’t watch the movie with their mouths shut. It is NOT Rocky Horror, people!

  2. While I do enjoy reading, I’m not a “seen the movie, now must read the books” kind of person. If by chance I’ve already read the books prior to seeing the movie, then I enjoy re-reading those books again. But once I’ve seen a movie, it’s sort of a let-down for me to then go back and read the book. Probably because I’m more of a visual person than an imaginative one.

  3. ABB says:

    That’s cool, Alan. I don’t think I have ever read a book after seeing the movie of it first, so I totally understand what you are saying. The HP books were long and involved that so much had to be left out of the movies though… that’s why I would recommend reading if you enjoyed what you saw. I tend to be a visual reader in that I “make” the movie in my head as I read so I really appreciate when movies do a book justice. Some of the HP movies came fairly close. Probably The Lord of the Rings movies came closest to my mental image.